It's fine with me, since it probably doesn't touch anything that's widely used... if no one else objects, I'd say go for it.
Steve On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Gabe Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Specifying the right bus in the MP tables partially fixed the > > kernel's handling of interrupts, but there was also a semi-corner case > > bug in how one of the instructions was microcoded which was also > > partially breaking things. I have a patch and I've verified it fixes the > > problem, and I'm running the X86_SE regressions on zizzer to see if > > those changed and to update them if appropriate. > > > > My question is, should I push this into the stable repo? I'm > > thinking yes but I figured I'd check before needlessly causing headaches. > > > > Gabe > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > > Somebody? Anybody? > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
