Alright, I just fired off a regression run. I'll take care of updating it.
Nate On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Gabe Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > It was the change to add the vsyscall page. atomic didn't change, and I > think timing changed just because the layout of memory changed a little. > It should be fine to update the stats. > > Gabe > > Gabe Black wrote: >> I'm looking at it. I think there were three x86 changes since these last >> passed, "X86: Hook up time syscall on X86", "X86: Enable x86_64 vsyscall >> support", and "X86: Fix problem with movhps instruction". I figure out >> which one, and look at the stats changes. >> >> Gabe >> >> nathan binkert wrote: >> >>>> ***** build/X86_SE/tests/fast/long/70.twolf/x86/linux/simple-timing FAILED! >>>> ***** build/X86_SE/tests/fast/long/00.gzip/x86/linux/simple-timing FAILED! >>>> ***** build/X86_SE/tests/fast/long/10.mcf/x86/linux/simple-timing FAILED! >>>> ***** build/X86_SE/tests/fast/long/20.parser/x86/linux/simple-timing >>>> FAILED! >>>> ***** build/X86_SE/tests/fast/long/60.bzip2/x86/linux/simple-timing FAILED! >>>> >>>> >>> Looks like you changed timing somewhere. Vince, Gabe? Can someone >>> run regressions? (I can if you guys just want to sign off.) >>> >>> Nate >>> _______________________________________________ >>> m5-dev mailing list >>> m5-dev@m5sim.org >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-dev mailing list >> m5-dev@m5sim.org >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
