> On 2010-07-10 08:52:15, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > > src/cpu/base.cc, line 463 > > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/51/diff/1/?file=751#file751line463> > > > > Is there a reason to allocate this dynamically instead of having a > > single static counter per CPU object?
No, not at all. I'm not sure why I did that but I can alter it. - Timothy ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/51/#review65 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2010-07-09 18:14:44, Timothy Jones wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/51/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2010-07-09 18:14:44) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Summary > ------- > > CPU: Add functions to get the number of executed instructions and set the > maximum number of instructions to execute to the CPUs and allow them to be > called from python. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/cpu/BaseCPU.py 249f174e6f37 > src/cpu/base.hh 249f174e6f37 > src/cpu/base.cc 249f174e6f37 > src/cpu/o3/cpu.hh 249f174e6f37 > src/cpu/simple/base.hh 249f174e6f37 > src/python/swig/sim_object.i 249f174e6f37 > src/sim/eventq.hh 249f174e6f37 > src/sim/sim_object.hh 249f174e6f37 > src/sim/sim_object.cc 249f174e6f37 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/51/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Timothy > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
