Hi everyone,
As you'll have seen, I've made some updates to the reviews I posted
recently to help implement SMARTS. I'd like to commit the trivial ones
towards the end of next week, if no-one objects. These are:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/35/
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/50/
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/52/
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/54/
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/55/
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/58/
I'd like to commit this too, if people are happy with the fix:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/49/
This one I'm going to wait for Steve to push his patch for
SimObject.__getattr__ that I can take advantage of:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/53/
This one I'm going to leave until Nate has pushed his changes to the
stats and has thought about how it can be incorporated:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/56/
This one I'm working on adding a pointer into the event queue to the
variable that should be used as a comparison. I'm also going to move
the python methods out of SimObject and let swig wrap the BaseCPU. I
think that's what was agreed from reading the comments, right?
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/51/
These are still work-in-progress until I've taken the branch predictor
out of the in-order CPU (the second patch depends on the first):
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/47/
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/48/
Finally, this one I'll leave until all others have been committed, since
it relies on them to work:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/57/
Does that sound ok to everyone?
Cheers
Tim
--
Timothy M. Jones
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/tjones1
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev