-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/227/#review318
-----------------------------------------------------------


You're commit message needs reformatting. The first line is much too long.


src/arch/arm/registers.hh
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/227/#comment432>

    Lets avoid trivial whitespace changes mixed in with other stuff. Please 
make this a separate change.



src/arch/arm/registers.hh
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/227/#comment431>

    Why was this added? I'm mostly just curious. Did something depend on it? I 
don't like the idea of constants trivially and consistently derived from other 
constants being defined in all the ISAs, but it's probably not worth doing 
anything about it here.


- Gabe


On 2010-08-23 09:36:10, Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/227/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-08-23 09:36:10)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> ARM: fixed a bug in the arm register flattening logic (FP_Base_DepTag was set 
> too low)
> when decoding a srs instruction, invalid mode encoding returns invalid 
> instruction.
> this can happen when garbage instructions are fetched from mispredicted path
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/arm/registers.hh 47d9409b2b7f 
>   src/cpu/o3/rename_impl.hh 47d9409b2b7f 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/227/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to