That seems reasonable to me. This brings up how subprojects are built. Do we make them scons targets or what? I dealt with that for statetrace by giving it its own makefile, and I think that's how other things like that were handled (m5term for instance). Scons is supposed to be so much better than make, so maybe we should use it? I can see how it might over complicate things, though.
Gabe Ali Saidi wrote: > > A long time ago we thought about putting a m5/system/<arch> directory > where we would put architecture dependent code system code (boot > loaders, alpha console, etc). How do we feel about this? We could move > the alpha code in there now that HP relicensed it. Additionally, I've > got a tiny ARM boot loader I'm looking for a place for and a new > repository seems like overkill,\. > > Thanks, > > Ali > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
