Flyspray would be good. We don't use it like we should, but it's probably the most appropriate place. I'm not familiar with the checkpoint tester. How does it work (link to the wiki would be fine), and what were the differences?
Gabe Beckmann, Brad wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > While using the checkpoint tester script, I noticed that at least > X86_FS with the atomic + classic memory system encounters differences > in the checkpoint state. The good news is that none of the patches I > have out for review add any more checkpoint differences, but we still > should track down the existing bugs at some point. Should I use > flyspray to document the bugs, or would you prefer me to document > these bugs some other way? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brad > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
