> On 2011-01-12 17:04:00, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> >
> 
> Nilay Vaish wrote:
>     I don't know why the comment went missing. I'll post the question again.
>     I think the states MT_SB and MT_IB are not required. In fact, I am not 
>     sure why unblock messages have to be sent out.

I'm confused.  I just asked for the commented out transition to be deleted.  
I'm not sure what comment you're referring to.

When you say the unblock messages, I assume you are referring to the WB_acks, 
right?  I believe the acks need to be sent out because you want to block the L1 
until it receives the acks.  Otherwise, sinking random writeback acks can be 
confusing and lead to several bugs, which currently this protocol definitely 
has.  There may be further optimizations we can make, such as removing the 
MT_SM and MT_IB states, as well as possibly combining L1_PUTX and L1_PUTX_old 
events.  However, I suggest making those optimizations in a separate patch.  In 
my opinion, right now the number one priority is to fix this protocol as soon 
as possible.  Otherwise when checked in, my series of patches will expose 
several bugs in the protocol and thus break the regression tester.


- Brad


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/420/#review723
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-01-10 11:48:16, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/420/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-01-10 11:48:16)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Ruby: Fixes MESI CMP directory protocol
> The current implementation of MESI CMP directory protocol is broken.
> This patch, from Arkaprava Basu, fixes the protocol.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_CMP_directory-L1cache.sm c06505ff551e 
>   src/mem/protocol/MESI_CMP_directory-L2cache.sm c06505ff551e 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/420/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to