THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#337 - Checkpoint Tester Identifies Mismatches (Bugs) for X86_FS User who did this: - Brad Beckmann (beckmabd) ---------- Responses below: 1. Actually I don't believe the MOESI_hammer part of the binary is important at all. It just happened to be the particular binary I had built when observing the issue. Since the test uses X86_FS in atomic mode, any X86_FS binary should behave the same. 2. Yes, the script option doesn't matter either. I only specified it because I copied it from the example listed in checkpoint-tester.py. 3. I believe that since each user may have their kernel in different locations that it made sense that a default wasn't specified. I'll send you a separate mail with the specific kernel I used. So in summary, the following commands also lead to the exact same problem: % scons -j 4 default=X86_FS build/X86_FS/m5.debug USE_MYSQL=False NO_FAST_ALLOC=1 EXTRAS= % util/checkpoint-tester.py -i 2000 -- build/X86_FS/m5.debug configs/example/fs.py ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.m5sim.org/flyspray/task/337#comment164 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. You can be removed from future notifications by visiting the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
