> Seems reasonable.... I would vote for something like > binaries/(alpha|arm|x86|sparc|...)/(32|64|thumb|whatever|else)/files > with a symlink of: binaries/(alpha|arm|x86|sparc|...)/default/ to whatever is > a good default so the scripts can just use the default, but if we want to get > more advanced in the future that is a possibility.
Why not just take advantage of SysPaths stuff (maybe have to extend it or clean it up a bit) and try to configure a path that first looks in the most specific place and then successively more generic locations? Symlinks just seem annoying. Do we really need x86/32 and x86/64, or can we just follow a convention like linux and have amd64 and i386 and be done with it? I guess that doesn't give you an obvious place to have common space unless you have a third directory called x86. Maybe arm is more complicated. How does the kernel deal with it? Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
