Does anyone else think that it's insane to have one file called fault.hh and another called faults.hh?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote: > The diff didn't change, just the description. I was hoping review board > would see it was the same diff but it didn't. > > Gabe > > Gabe Black wrote: >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/453/ >> >> >> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, >> and Nathan Binkert. >> By Gabe Black. >> >> /Updated 2011-01-29 19:36:33.797798/ >> >> >> Description (updated) >> >> Fault: Move the definition of NoFault from faults.hh to fault.hh. >> >> Moving the definition of NoFault into fault.hh doesn't bring any new >> dependencies with it, and allows some files to include just fault.hh which >> has >> less baggage. NoFault will still be available to everything that includes >> faults.hh because it includes fault.hh. >> >> >> Diffs (updated) >> >> * src/sim/fault.hh (31a04e5ac4be) >> * src/sim/faults.hh (31a04e5ac4be) >> >> View Diff <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/453/diff/> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
