> On 2011-02-14 06:48:03, Nathan Binkert wrote: > > LICENSE, line 1 > > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/486/diff/1/?file=10325#file10325line1> > > > > Should we put everyone in here? (And all licenses?)
I think we should as most of the license text says in, "source and binary forms." The LICENSE file gets sucked into the simulator as a string and can be printed with a command line parameter, so it probably should have all of them. - Ali ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/486/#review860 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-02-13 23:47:40, Gabe Black wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/486/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-02-13 23:47:40) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > Info: Clean up some info files. > > Get rid of RELEASE_NOTES since we no longer do releases, update some of the > information in README, and update the date in LICENSE. > > > Diffs > ----- > > LICENSE e8f4bb35dca9 > README e8f4bb35dca9 > RELEASE_NOTES e8f4bb35dca9 > src/SConscript e8f4bb35dca9 > src/python/m5/main.py e8f4bb35dca9 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/486/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Gabe > >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
