This does interact with Korey's change a bit, so hopefully we don't end
up stepping on each other too much. Since somebody's going to have to
update a patch anyway, I'll look at whether that result stuff in the
dyninst can go away too.

Gabe

On 03/30/11 12:09, Gabe Black wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/612/#review1035
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> - Gabe
>
>
> On 2011-03-30 08:58:56, Ali Saidi wrote:
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/612/
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> (Updated 2011-03-30 08:58:56)
>>
>>
>> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
>> Nathan Binkert.
>>
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>>
>> CPU: Remove references to memory copy operations
>>
>>
>> Diffs
>> -----
>>
>>   src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh d54b7775a6b0 
>>   src/cpu/inorder/inorder_dyn_inst.hh d54b7775a6b0 
>>   src/cpu/o3/commit_impl.hh d54b7775a6b0 
>>   src/cpu/ozone/lw_back_end_impl.hh d54b7775a6b0 
>>   src/cpu/static_inst.hh d54b7775a6b0 
>>   src/cpu/thread_state.hh d54b7775a6b0 
>>
>> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/612/diff
>>
>>
>> Testing
>> -------
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ali
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to