-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/661/#review1161
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/GarnetLink_d.py
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/661/#comment1601>

    In garnet, the link width is actually equal to flit size (i.e. the entire 
flit is injected into the link). [bigger packets such as data are thereby 
broken into multiple flits]. 
    So not sure if having both a "bandwidth_factor" and a "flit_size" parameter 
inside BaseGarnetNetwork.py will work. 
    Perhaps we should set flit_size equal to bandwidth_factor there? 
    "link_bandwidth" is a clearer term but I understand that is not true for 
simple network where the endpoint bandwidth comes into play...


- Tushar


On 2011-04-27 10:38:47, Brad Beckmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/661/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-04-27 10:38:47)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> network: generalized bw for basic links
> 
> Generalized the specification of bw for basic links.  This value is then
> translated to the specific value used by the simple and Garnet networks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/ruby/Ruby.py b02bca5aed04 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/BasicLink.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/BasicLink.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/BasicLink.py PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/GarnetLink_d.py PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/SConscript b02bca5aed04 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/SimpleLink.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/SimpleLink.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/SimpleLink.py PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/simple/SimpleNetwork.cc b02bca5aed04 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/661/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brad
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to