Thanks for the suggestion Andrea, sorry about that. I will look at this.
Regards, Ignatios From: andreas.hans...@arm.com To: gem5-users@gem5.org Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:45:08 +0100 Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 vol.2 Hi Ignatios, Once again, I think the topic is pretty far beyond what I would consider "user" concerns, and I would argue the thread should move to the dev list. I don't think there are any issues in the C++ code you are referring to. More likely something goes wrong in your Python configuration or in your implementation of getMasterPort for the modified object. I would suggest starting with a very simple Python script connecting the ports you want (avoid the complex fs/se and CPU config etc to ensure you actually control every step of what is happening). Once that is under control, set a breakpoint in your getMasterPort and ensure that is is actually returning the port you intend when called with the appropriate string. Good luck. Andreas From: ignacio charalabidis <ign...@hotmail.com> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Date: Sunday, 28 April 2013 19:42 To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 vol.2 Well, I think I have found the mistake but I do not know where it comes from. So, inside the pyobject.cc there is that code in the connectPorts // generic master/slave port connection BaseMasterPort& masterPort = mo1->getMasterPort(name1, i1); BaseSlavePort& slavePort = mo2->getSlavePort(name2, i2); my_inform("!! WILL CONNECT: %s WITH %s \n",name1,name2); my_inform("!! MasterPort %s <-> Slaveport %s \n",masterPort.name(),slavePort.name()); masterPort.bind(slavePort); the output is this: debug info: !! WILL CONNECT: second_icache_port WITH second_cpu_side debug info: !! MasterPort system.cpu.second_icache_port Slaveport system.secondmainCpu.icache.cpu_side Despite is says it will connect it with second_cpu_side, it connects_it with cpu_side. Any help why that might happen? Where is this function that is being called? in the port.cc it does not take arguments, so I guess it's not that, and in the mem_object.cc it does not return anything. Thanks, Ignatios From: andreas.hans...@arm.com To: gem5-users@gem5.org Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:28:33 +0100 Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 That looks alright. Make sure the cpu also has an if-statement for "second_icache_port" in getMasterPort and that it returns a unique port. The string name on the right hand side in the Python description has no importance. Andreas From: ignacio charalabidis <ign...@hotmail.com> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Date: Saturday, 27 April 2013 20:11 To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 Thanks Andrea, as far as the 1 is concerned I am doing this: icache_port = MasterPort("Instruction Port") dcache_port = MasterPort("Data Port") second_icache_port = MasterPort("Second Instruction Port") _cached_ports = ['icache_port', 'dcache_port','second_icache_port'] and then the connections seems correct to me. Is there anything else? Does the name inside the Master Port plays any role? Because for example, I haven't used Second Instruction Port anywhere else. Do I need to create a new class for example, or it is not a problem that icache_port and second_icache_port use the same? Thanks, Ignatios From: andreas.hans...@arm.com To: gem5-users@gem5.org Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:02:10 +0100 Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 I would think there are three places where things could be going wrong: 1 In the python code where the ports are being connected 2 In the getMaster/SlavePort in the cache where the name from the python code is mapped to an actual port instance 3 In the port subclass used Andreas From: ignacio charalabidis <ign...@hotmail.com> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Date: Saturday, 27 April 2013 19:50 To: "gem5-users@gem5.org" <gem5-users@gem5.org> Subject: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 Hello, in my config.ini file, I am having this: icache_port=system.cpu.icache.cpu_side second_icache_port=system.secondmainCpu.icache.second_cpu_side I have made some modificiations in order to have two ports in my cpus and in my caches. But then in my code, for example when I have this: MasterPort::sendTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt) { ... DPRINTF(MyFlag, "return value port name %s\n",_slavePort->name()); ... } I see this output: system.mainCpu.icache_port: return value port name system.cpu.icache.cpu_side which is correct. But for the second_icache_port i see this: system.mainCpu.second_icache_port: return value port name system.secondmainCpu.icache.cpu_side I think at somewhere, I should define what the slave port is going to be, but I do not know where to do that. I have checked for my secondCPU as well and the same things happen. Although it appears correctly in the config.ini file, it does not return what it supposes to return. Instead it returns the same slave port as the icache_port. Any help? Edit: For example, in the BaseCPU::takeOverFrom, in the base.cc file,If I call these: BaseSlavePort &inst_peer_port = oldCPU->getInstPort().getSlavePort(); BaseSlavePort &second_inst_peer_port = oldCPU->getSecondInstPort().getSlavePort(); they will return the same although: oldCPU->getInstPort() is icache_port oldCPU->getSecondInstPort() is second_icache_port They will both return system.cpu.icache.cpu_side as their slave port. regards, Ignatios -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users