Thanks for the suggestion Andrea,

sorry about that. I will look at this.

Regards,
Ignatios

From: andreas.hans...@arm.com
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:45:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 vol.2






Hi Ignatios,



Once again, I think the topic is pretty far beyond what I would consider "user" 
concerns, and I would argue the thread should move to the dev list.



I don't think there are any issues in the C++ code you are referring to. More 
likely something goes wrong in your Python configuration or in your 
implementation of getMasterPort for the modified object. I would suggest 
starting with a very simple Python
 script connecting the ports you want (avoid the complex fs/se and CPU config 
etc to ensure you actually control every step of what is happening). Once that 
is under control, set a breakpoint in your getMasterPort and ensure that is is 
actually returning the
 port you intend when called with the appropriate string.



Good luck.



Andreas





From: ignacio charalabidis <ign...@hotmail.com>

Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org>

Date: Sunday, 28 April 2013 19:42

To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org>

Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5 vol.2







Well, I think I have found the mistake but I do not know where it comes from.



So, inside the pyobject.cc  there is that code in the connectPorts



    // generic master/slave port connection

    BaseMasterPort& masterPort = mo1->getMasterPort(name1, i1);

    BaseSlavePort& slavePort   = mo2->getSlavePort(name2, i2);

    

    my_inform("!! WILL CONNECT: %s WITH %s \n",name1,name2); 

    my_inform("!! MasterPort %s <-> Slaveport %s 
\n",masterPort.name(),slavePort.name());




    masterPort.bind(slavePort);



 the output is this:



debug info: !! WILL CONNECT: second_icache_port WITH second_cpu_side 

debug info: !! MasterPort system.cpu.second_icache_port Slaveport 
system.secondmainCpu.icache.cpu_side




Despite is says it will connect it with second_cpu_side, it connects_it with 
cpu_side.



Any help why that might happen? Where is this function that is being called?



in the port.cc it does not take arguments, so I guess it's not that, and in the 
mem_object.cc it does not return anything.



Thanks,

Ignatios






From: andreas.hans...@arm.com

To: gem5-users@gem5.org

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:28:33 +0100

Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5



That looks alright. Make sure the cpu also has an if-statement for 
"second_icache_port" in getMasterPort and that it returns a unique port.



The string name on the right hand side in the Python description has no 
importance.



Andreas





From: ignacio charalabidis <ign...@hotmail.com>

Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org>

Date: Saturday, 27 April 2013 20:11

To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org>

Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5







Thanks Andrea,



as far as the 1 is concerned I am doing this:



  icache_port = MasterPort("Instruction Port")

  dcache_port = MasterPort("Data Port")

  second_icache_port = MasterPort("Second Instruction Port")

   _cached_ports = ['icache_port', 'dcache_port','second_icache_port']



and then the connections seems correct to me.



Is there anything else? Does the name inside the Master Port plays any role? 
Because for example, I haven't used Second Instruction Port anywhere else.



Do I need to create a new class for example, or it is not a problem that 
icache_port and second_icache_port use the same?



Thanks, 

Ignatios




From: andreas.hans...@arm.com

To: gem5-users@gem5.org

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:02:10 +0100

Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5



I would think there are three places where things could be going wrong:



1 In the python code where the ports are being connected



2 In the getMaster/SlavePort in the cache where the name from the python code 
is mapped to an actual port instance



3 In the port subclass used



Andreas





From: ignacio charalabidis <ign...@hotmail.com>

Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org>

Date: Saturday, 27 April 2013 19:50

To: "gem5-users@gem5.org" <gem5-users@gem5.org>

Subject: [gem5-users] Slave and Master Ports in gem5







Hello,



in my config.ini file, I am having this:



icache_port=system.cpu.icache.cpu_side

second_icache_port=system.secondmainCpu.icache.second_cpu_side



I have made some modificiations in order to have two ports in my cpus and in my 
caches.



But then in my code, for example when I have this:



MasterPort::sendTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)

{

...

    DPRINTF(MyFlag, "return value port name %s\n",_slavePort->name());

...



}



I see this output:



system.mainCpu.icache_port: return value port name system.cpu.icache.cpu_side 
which is correct.

But for the second_icache_port i see this:

system.mainCpu.second_icache_port: return value port name 
system.secondmainCpu.icache.cpu_side



I think at somewhere, I should define what the slave port is going to be,  but 
I do not know where to do that. I have checked for my secondCPU as well and the 
same things happen. Although it appears correctly in the config.ini file, it 
does not return what
 it supposes to return. Instead it returns the same slave port as the 
icache_port.



Any help?





Edit:

 

For example, in the BaseCPU::takeOverFrom, in the base.cc file,If I call these:



BaseSlavePort &inst_peer_port = oldCPU->getInstPort().getSlavePort();

BaseSlavePort &second_inst_peer_port = 
oldCPU->getSecondInstPort().getSlavePort();



they will return the same although:



oldCPU->getInstPort()  is icache_port

oldCPU->getSecondInstPort()  is second_icache_port



They will both return 



system.cpu.icache.cpu_side as their slave port.



regards,

Ignatios






-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents
 to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information 
in any medium. Thank you.



_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list 
gem5-users@gem5.org 
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users





-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents
 to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information 
in any medium. Thank you.



_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list 
gem5-users@gem5.org 
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users





-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents
 to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information 
in any medium. Thank you.




_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users                            
          
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to