Does that mean I don't have to use m5threads and just use the regular
pthread library ?

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:13 PM Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Yeah, it's something like that. We usually suggest using N + 1 cores where
> N is the number of threads. You can always use more ;).
>
> As a side note, if you configure things correctly (whatever that means...)
> I believe you can get pthreads to work. You can link to the pthreads on the
> host and I think gem5 can correctly execute that code.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:42 AM John Smith <jjsmith2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That sounds great. In the meantime I will work a bit more on the SE mode.
>> Also do you have any inputs on the following ?
>>
>> m5threads: If there are 9 CPU, and the host CPU launches 9 threads, then
>> are 8 threads launched on the remaining 8 CPUs and the 9th thread has to
>> wait for a
>> thread to complete to begin execution. If not then where does it run as
>> all the 9 CPUs are currently running a thread (1 host + 8 threads).
>>
>> Thank you,
>> John Smith
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Soon! https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-195
>>>
>>> We're hopeful that in the next month or so all of this code will be
>>> public.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:55 AM John Smith <jjsmith2...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Will I also be able to run the GPU model in the FS mode ?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:39 AM Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest using full system mode instead of SE mode if you're running
>>>>> a multithreaded workload. In FS mode, there's a full OS so it can handle
>>>>> thread switching, etc. For Parsec on x86 we've created a set of resources
>>>>> for you to get started. See
>>>>> https://gem5.googlesource.com/public/gem5-resources/+/refs/heads/stable/src/parsec/
>>>>> for details.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:07 AM John Smith via gem5-users <
>>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am sorry for the confusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am looking to run a multithreaded application on a mesh of 3x3
>>>>>> CPUs, where the benchmark spawns 9 threads and each thread runs on
>>>>>> a single CPU (1:1). I went through the past discussions on this
>>>>>> mailing list and saw that m5threads was needed to do this. I have some
>>>>>> questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) If there are 9 CPU, and the host CPU launches 9 threads, then are
>>>>>> 8 threads launched on the remaining 8 CPUs and the 9th thread has to wait
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>> thread to complete to begin execution. If not then where does it run
>>>>>> as all the 9 CPUs are currently running a thread (1 host + 8 threads).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (2) Anthony Gutierrez said that m5threads is no longer needed. Is
>>>>>> that correct for gem5-21 ?
>>>>>>      (Subject: Simulating multiprogrammed & multithreaded workloads
>>>>>> in SE mode?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (3) Right now I am trying to build PARSEC 3.0 benchmarks with
>>>>>> m5threads, but I am receiving some errors as follows and I am not sure 
>>>>>> why:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *base_dir/local/gcc/bin/gcc -O3 -g -funroll-loops
>>>>>> -fprefetch-loop-arrays  base_dir/gem5dev/parsec-3.0/pkgs/pthread.o
>>>>>> -static-libgcc -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,--as-needed
>>>>>> -DPARSEC_VERSION=3.0-beta-20150206 -o siman_tsp siman_tsp.o  -L
>>>>>> base_dir/local/gcc/lib64 -L base_dir/local/gcc/lib ./.libs/libgslsiman.a
>>>>>> ../rng/.libs/libgslrng.a ../ieee-utils/.libs/libgslieeeutils.a
>>>>>> ../err/.libs/libgslerr.a ../sys/.libs/libgslsys.a 
>>>>>> ../utils/.libs/libutils.a
>>>>>> -lpthread -lmbase_dir/gem5dev/parsec-3.0/pkgs/pthread.o: In function
>>>>>> `__pthread_initialize_minimal':pthread.c:(.text+0x97): undefined 
>>>>>> reference
>>>>>> to `_dl_phdr'pthread.c:(.text+0xd9): undefined reference to `_dl_phnum'*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Generally how should I go about integrating the m5thread with any
>>>>>> benchmark?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (4) Also, what other CPU benchmarks are recommended which are
>>>>>> multithreaded and can be run in a manner where I can
>>>>>> launch a thread on each CPU ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank You,
>>>>>> John Smith
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=gem5-users@gem5.org&q=from:%22Gutierrez%2C+Anthony%22>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:50 AM Gabe Black via gem5-users <
>>>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's essentially right, although gem5 does have some plumbing to
>>>>>>> run multiple event queues within the same simulation which can 
>>>>>>> coordinate
>>>>>>> with each other within a small window (quantum) of time. gem5 has 
>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>> for fibers/threads/coroutines, but these are not typically used to model
>>>>>>> events. Events are processed inline when they happen using a simple
>>>>>>> function call.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gabe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:46 AM gabriel.busnot--- via gem5-users <
>>>>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Short answer : no, you can only run several simulations in
>>>>>>>> parallel, but not a single simulation using one thread per CPU.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gem5 relies on Discrete Event Simulation (DES) to simulate the
>>>>>>>> concurrent behavior of HW.
>>>>>>>> DES is intrinsically sequential in its execution as it relies on
>>>>>>>> coroutines (also called user user threads, greed threads, fibers, 
>>>>>>>> etc.).
>>>>>>>> Parallelizing such application is a very hard task that often
>>>>>>>> requires a lot of subtle code transformations to efficiently protect 
>>>>>>>> shared
>>>>>>>> resources.
>>>>>>>> If done correctly, then parallel DES does not have all the good
>>>>>>>> properties of classic DES, especially determinism... Unless you add 
>>>>>>>> extra
>>>>>>>> care to preserve it, which is hard, too. Trust me ;).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This question has been discussed back in the days but seems stalled
>>>>>>>> now: http://www.m5sim.org/Parallel_M5
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Gabriel
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>>>>>>>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>>>>>>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>>>>>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s

Reply via email to