Hi again, 

Just to report that moving to x86 works: It is possible to create a checkpoint 
with KVM and restore from it using --cpu-type AtomicSimpleCPU (or any other 
gem5 cpu model) combined with --restore-with-cpu AtomicSimpleCPU, with multiple 
cores. So I don't even need to go to these other complex solutions (previously 
mentioned) to generate checkpoints as I wanted.
I thought that was not possible in aarch64 because:
i) restoring a KVM checkpoint with --cpu-type AtomicSimpleCPU (or any other 
gem5 cpu model) combined with --restore-with-cpu ArmV8KvmCPU caused the 
simulation to get stucked
and
ii) restoring a KVM checkpoint with --cpu-type AtomicSimpleCPU (or any other 
gem5 cpu model) combined with --restore-with-cpu AtomicSimpleCPU 
[   57.011642] kernel BUG at 
/work/gem5-scripts/submodules/linux/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:602!

Results with configs/example/fs.py and gem5 version [DEVELOP-FOR-V21.1]

Best, 
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
  • [gem5-users] Boot FS with ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
    • [gem5-users] Re: Boot... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
      • [gem5-users] Re: ... Giacomo Travaglini via gem5-users
        • [gem5-users] ... Pedro Henrique Exenberger Becker via gem5-users
          • [gem5-use... Giacomo Travaglini via gem5-users
            • [gem... Pedro Henrique Exenberger Becker via gem5-users
              • ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
                • ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
                • ... Giacomo Travaglini via gem5-users
                • ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
                • ... Giacomo Travaglini via gem5-users
                • ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
                • ... Giacomo Travaglini via gem5-users
                • ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
                • ... Pedro Becker via gem5-users
                • ... Giacomo Travaglini via gem5-users

Reply via email to