Hi Jason, Thanks for the feedback. That was more or less the same conclusion I had... I tried both and verified that they generate a very similar code, except for the name of the variable. Perhaps it's just for readability, who knows.
Thanks again, anyway! Pedro. Jason Z via gem5-users <gem5-users@gem5.org> escreveu no dia sábado, 12/02/2022 à(s) 06:08: > Hey Pedro, > > I ran into a similar issue with naming like that with trying to create new > instructions, and the best I could tell it seems like the XUR are for > microops, but I'm honestly just guessing based on what I saw previously, > and I ended up just using XBase since I was creating a store instruction > and modeling it after an STRX64 instruction, so I tried to stick to that > framework... > > Sorry I don't have a better answer, but if anyone else has any insight to > any reference to their meanings, I'd be interested in it as well... > > Respectfully, > > Jason Z. > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org > To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org > %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s > -- Pedro Henrique Exenberger Becker Ph.D. Student at Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
