Hi Congwu Zhang,

I was able to fix that error with this information, but now there are some
other errors related to missing options that the KiteLarge_EWMC.py script
requires.
Some of these may be:
concentration_factor
num_chiplets
num_mem_ctrls
chiplet_width
chiplet_clock
top_vc
tsv_width
noi_width
tsv_clock
bottom_vc
mem_clock

This may not be an exhaustive list of all the options needed, but I figured
this out from the KiteLarge_EWMC.py file. I just looked for options
exclusively found in that file and nowhere else in Gem5.
As far as I know, if I want these options enabled, I may need to add them
to the Options.py file manually. Is that correct?
Also, if possible, do you know how I can add those options otherwise?

Thank you for your time and help. I really appreciate it.

Sincerely,
Preet.


On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:46 AM zhangcongwu--- via gem5-users <
gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:

> Hi Preet,
>
> There's a missing parameter in configs/ruby/Ruby.py:259 (maybe different,
> search makeTopology), you should add a `full_system` param to this method.
> The order of these parameters should be same as `makeTopology` in
> `KiteLarge_EWMC.py`.
>
> Best,
> Congwu Zhang
>
>
> *From:* Preet Derasari via gem5-users <gem5-users@gem5.org>
> *Date:* 2024-02-23 04:05
> *To:* Srikant Bharadwaj <srikan...@gmail.com>
> *CC:* The gem5 Users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org>; Krishna, Tushar
> <tus...@ece.gatech.edu>; Preet Derasari <preetderas...@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* [gem5-users] Re: Chiplet Simulation with Gem5
> Hi Srikant,
>
> Thank you so much for answering my questions and providing the reference
> file.
>
> Since I am new to NoC simulation and using Garnet 3.0 (HeteroGarnet), I
> feel a little lost regarding running a SE or FS mode simulation.
>
> I checked the documentation on Gem5 posted (
> https://www.gem5.org/documentation/general_docs/ruby/heterogarnet/) and
> read the Kite paper (https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3437539.3437683).
>
> Nevertheless I could not figure out how to run a simulation (specifically
> in SE mode) where I can use the topology you provided.
>
> I am using the deprecated se.py file in the following manner:
> build/X86/gem5.opt configs/deprecated/example/se.py --num-cpus=4
> --num-dirs=4 --cpu-type=DerivO3CPU --cpu-clock=2.5GHz --caches
> --l1d_size=64kB --l1d_assoc=8 --l1i_size=32kB --l1i_assoc=8
> --mem-type=SimpleMemory --mem-size=8GB --ruby --network=garnet
> --topology=KiteLarge_EWMC --mesh-rows=2 --cmd=</path/to/binary>
> --options="<binary args>"
>
> When I run this command, I get the following message:
> =======================================================================
> gem5 Simulator System.  https://www.gem5.org
> gem5 is copyrighted software; use the --copyright option for details.
>
> gem5 version 23.1.0.0
> gem5 compiled Feb 19 2024 14:33:34
> gem5 started Feb 22 2024 14:48:41
> command line: build/X86/gem5.opt configs/deprecated/example/se.py
> --num-cpus=4 --num-dirs=4 --cpu-type=DerivO3CPU --cpu-clock=2.5GHz --caches
> --l1d_size=64kB --l1d_assoc=8 --l1i_size=32kB --l1i_assoc=8
> --mem-type=SimpleMemory --mem-size=8GB --ruby --network=garnet
> --topology=KiteLarge_EWMC --mesh-rows=2 --cmd=</path/to/binary>
> '--options=<binary args>'
>
> warn: The se.py script is deprecated. It will be removed in future
> releases of  gem5.
> TypeError: makeTopology() missing 1 required positional argument: 'Router'
>
> At:
>   gem5/configs/ruby/Ruby.py(262): create_system
>   configs/deprecated/example/se.py(268): <module>
>   src/python/m5/main.py(669): main
> ========================================================================
>
> I understand that the se.py file may not be equipped to run a HeteroGarnet
> simulation, but I could not find any other simulation files that would help
> me.
>
> I would really appreciate it if you could help me find a simulation file
> along with any modifications needed to Gem5 to support a simulation with
> the Kite Large topology.
>
> Thank you again for your help.
>
> Sincerely,
> Preet.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 8:08 PM Srikant Bharadwaj <srikan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Preet,
>> 1. I am attaching a config file for Kite Large topology that you can use
>> as a reference for building chiplet-based topologies. More info on Kite
>> Large can be found in this paper:
>> https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3437539.3437683
>> 2. HeteroGarnet only handles the network traffic. So HeteroGarnet is can
>> handle any thread pinning that happens on the core levels as long as the
>> cores are connected to each other using a topology and Heterogarnet is
>> enabled.
>> 3. Yes, you can perform SE mode simulations as well as Garnet standalone
>> simulations with HeteroGarnet. Let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Srikant
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:55 PM Preet Derasari via gem5-users <
>> gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Dr. Krishna,
>>>
>>> Thank you so much for your response.
>>>
>>> I read the documentation you linked to in your email and have a few
>>> questions.
>>> 1. Are there any example config files that you are aware of that can
>>> help me start with chiplet simulation (with some basic routing techniques
>>> and topologies)? If so, could you point me to them?
>>> 2. How does HeteroGarnet assign processing and other nodes to an
>>> application? Can I use methods like CPUSET() in C++ to assign a simulated
>>> core (node) to a thread (created using thread)?
>>> 3. Can I perform SE mode simulations of my applications, or is
>>> HeteroGarnet only applicable to FS (or the new gem5 v22 "boards")?
>>>
>>> I really appreciate your help.
>>>
>>> Thank you. Sincerely,
>>> Preet.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:24 AM Krishna, Tushar <tus...@ece.gatech.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The latest version of garnet in the gem5 repo allows you to model
>>>> multi-chiplet NoCs. *[The gem5_chips repo is deprecated - and was
>>>> actually forked off an earlier version of HeteroGarnet].*
>>>> Here is its documentation on the gem5 wiki:
>>>> https://www.gem5.org/documentation/general_docs/ruby/heterogarnet/
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tushar
>>>> On Feb 21, 2024 at 11:17 AM -0500, Preet Derasari via gem5-users <
>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org>, wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know how to do a chiplet based simulation on the latest
>>>> Gem5 version with garnet?
>>>>
>>>> My basic requirements are: running distributed C++ applications (using
>>>> multi-threading) on the Gem5 O3CPYU type, having the ability to control the
>>>> number of cores on individual chiplet dies (even one core per die is
>>>> sufficient), control the D-to-D bandwidth, and getting various statistics
>>>> including power consumption per die and in the interposer, overall latency
>>>> of communication between dies.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand these are optional: configuring a package with
>>>> different topologies (mesh XY, butterfly, etc), possibly different
>>>> packaging techniques (like 2D, 2.5D, 3D), simulate heterogenous components
>>>> like GPU with CPU, and other NoC parameters like flit with, interposer
>>>> width, etc.
>>>>
>>>> I tried an older version of Gem5 from Dr. Tushar Krishna's group called
>>>> gem5_chips (https://github.com/GT-CHIPS/gem5_chips) but I had to use
>>>> an older version of Python (2.7) and GCC (8) to even compile Gem5 on an
>>>> Ubuntu 20.04 system. Despite that I was not able to run their benchmark
>>>> beyond a certain instruction limit (using max-insts) since the simulator
>>>> started throwing assertion errors in the garnet2.0/OutVcState.cc code.
>>>>
>>>> I would really appreciate it if someone can point me towards the right
>>>> direction here.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you. Best regards,
>>>> Preet.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org

Reply via email to