It's on my to-do list, but I've been pretty busy lately... sorry. Steve
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was and I sent the information to Steve. I'm waiting for him to > figure out what is going on in the coherence protocol. I'm just not > familiar enough with the code to diagnose the problem. Ron also said > he would take a look at it, so you might have a solution soon. > > Ali > > > > On Mar 21, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Sujay Phadke wrote: > > Hi Ali, > > Were you able to reproduce the problem? > > > > - Sujay > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sujay Phadke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > To: "M5 users mailing list" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:45 AM > > Subject: Re: [m5-users] error running splash2 in beta 5 > > > > > >> I have attached the run.py config file I am using. I added the > >> following > >> command line parameters for checking the results as described in > >> the radix.c > >> file: > >> > >> -s : Print individual processor timing statistics. > >> -t : Check to make sure all keys are sorted correctly. > >> > >> If you use the "-t" option to test the result at the end, it > >> outputs the > >> errors. > >> > >> Everything else is the same. > >> > >> command to run: > >> > >> build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt configs/splash2/run.py -n 4 -b Radix > >> > >> > >> - Sujay > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ali Saidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "M5 users mailing list" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:02 AM > >> Subject: Re: [m5-users] error running splash2 in beta 5 > >> > >> > >>> Can you give us some information about what you're running > >>> configuration > >>> wise? Your config files would actually be good. You're stressing > >>> something that hasn't really been stressed before, so the first > >>> step is > >>> for us to be able to reliably duplicate the issue. > >>> > >>> Ali > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mar 12, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Sujay Phadke wrote: > >>> > >>>> I commented the assertion statement out. The benchmarks do > >>>> complete, but > >>>> calculations are incorrect for some of them. For example, radix > >>>> outputs > >>>> the following: > >>>> > >>>> warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(5, 4831387552, ...) > >>>> warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(13, 4831387552, ...) > >>>> error with key 6475, value 102548 96863 > >>>> error with key 7229, value 99786 97034 > >>>> error with key 28571, value 178321 165003 > >>>> error with key 28572, value 165003 141160 > >>>> error with key 28573, value 141160 140297 > >>>> error with key 51316, value 162386 146546 > >>>> error with key 55007, value 165327 139551 > >>>> error with key 55009, value 183538 165330 > >>>> > >>>> This didnt happen with beta 4. > >>>> > >>>> - Sujay > >>>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Reinhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > > >>>> To: "M5 users mailing list" <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:38 PM > >>>> Subject: Re: [m5-users] error running splash2 in beta 5 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> That could be related to the cache changes I made to get > >>>>> writebacks to > >>>>> allocate in the cache. Looking at the assert, I'd say there's > >>>>> a 50/50 > >>>>> chance that the bug is simply that the assertion isn't valid > >>>>> anymore > >>>>> rather than anything actually being broken. > >>>>> > >>>>> Unfortunately I won't have time to look at it in detail for a few > >>>>> days. Can you try just commenting out the assertion and seeing if > >>>>> those benchmarks complete successfully? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Steve > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Sujay Phadke <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> I am trying to run the splash2 in m5 beta 5. On 5 of the > >>>>>> benchmarks, I get the following error: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> m5.opt: build/ALPHA_SE/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh:1282: Packet* > >>>>>> Cache<TagStore>::getTimingPacket() [with TagStore = LRU]: > >>>>>> Assertion > >>>>>> `tags->findBlock(mshr->addr) == __null' failed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> and M5 aborts. Can someone explain what this means? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Sujay > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> m5-users mailing list > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> m5-users mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> m5-users mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> m5-users mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
