I have traced through on an error I was getting. The assertion says
the following:
void Cache<TagStore>::handleResponse(Packet*) [with TagStore = LRU]:
Assertion `target->pkt->cmd == MemCmd::ReadResp' failed.
I annotated the Cache trace printout to display what command the
packet his right before that assertion and the one causing the error
is a LoadLockedResp. Given that a LoadLockedResp is both an IsRead and
an IsResponse, I was wondering if it was safe to modify the assertion
to allow LoadLockedResp's as well, or if this would have other
unintended side-effects.
Thanks,
- Clint Smullen
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
