On Apr 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Javier Jose wrote:

> Hi Ali,
>
> Thanks for the help. I tried a suggestion from another user which  
> told me he had a similar problem and adding --l2cache to the command  
> line solved it, and it did. I appreciate your attention anyhow.
That still sounds a lot like a bug though. I would guess that it has  
something to do with the default responders not correctly handling  
that address and returning a error or a speculative read.

>
>
> Sorry for deviating but, Is SMT still unsupported for Full System?
I don't really know anything about SMT and Full System. Someone else  
will have to chime in.

Ali


> I have compiled ALPHA_FS w/:
>
> numThreads = 4
> smtNumFetchingThreads = 4
> smtFetchPolicy = RoundRobin
>
> However, different from SE in config.ini I can't just verify if is  
> it running multithreaded since (I assume) the Linux scheduler will  
> assign the workloads dynamically at runtime (with the scheduler). Is  
> this what is happening, or would it simply run everything serially;  
> no SMT?
>
> I wonder why would it not be supported if the Linux image is able to  
> handle multiple CPU's why can't it handle multiple hard-threads, at  
> least from 1 CPU?
>
> --
> Javier
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send m5-users mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of m5-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Assertion `blkSize == pkt->getSize()' failed. (Devraj Chapagain)
>   2. panic: Tried to execute unmapped address 0 (Devraj Chapagain)
>   3. Re: O3 error in FS: Aborting before starting simulation
>      (Ali Saidi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:27:49 -0700
> From: Devraj Chapagain <[email protected]>
> Subject: [m5-users] Assertion `blkSize == pkt->getSize()' failed.
> To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> hi everyone,I am using 16 copies of SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks in SE  
> mode for
> simulation. I got the error as:
>
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
> m5.opt: build/ALPHA_SE/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh:312: bool
> Cache<TagStore>::access(Packet*, typename TagStore::BlkType*&, int&,
> PacketList&) [with TagStore = LRU]: Assertion `blkSize == pkt- 
> >getSize()'
> failed.
>
> Could you please suggest me any solutions related to this problem.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> devraj
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/m5-users/attachments/20090410/bd0a177b/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:35:13 -0700
> From: Devraj Chapagain <[email protected]>
> Subject: [m5-users] panic: Tried to execute unmapped address 0
> To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> hi everyone,While I am working on 8 core and 2 thread in SPECCPU 2006
> in SE mode, i am facing panic problem.
>
> hello robert white,
> I saw you M5-users email correspondence with Ali, on this problem. On
> that email you replied you solved this problem. Could you please help
> me how to fix this problem, the problem is:
>
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
>
> panic: Tried to execute unmapped address 0.
>
>  @ cycle 17190562000
>
> [invoke:build/ALPHA_SE/arch/alpha/faults.cc, line 186]
>
> Program aborted at cycle 17190562000
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> devraj
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/m5-users/attachments/20090410/40632096/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:23:33 -0500
> From: Ali Saidi <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [m5-users] O3 error in FS: Aborting before starting
>        simulation
> To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> What kernel are you running? Have you modified the configuration in
> any way? If you're using a one of our kernels and haven't modified the
> configuration then the next thing to do would be to enable the trace
> flags for the caches and the o3 cpu a few thousand cycles before the
> panic occurs and see where the address in question is coming from.
>
>
> Ali
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:01 AM, Javier Jose wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to run ALPHA_FS with O3 but it is aborting before
> > finishing regardless of the benchmark.
> >
> > COMMAND LINE:
> >
> >  build/ALPHA_FS/m5.[any] -d /home/javier/log/mpgenc2_pvt configs/
> > example/fs.py -d --caches -b [benchmark]
> >
> > ERROR:
> >
> > info: Entering event queue @ 0.  Starting simulation...
> > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
> > responder): 0x80c4dbc0
> >  @ cycle 48692311000
> > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
> > Memory Usage: 197392 KBytes
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/panic/6c40f6ee
> > Program aborted at cycle 48692311000
> > Aborted
> >
> > Right now I am just trying to run just 1 thread; 1 CPU. I have been
> > using ALPBench and PARSEC with SimpleCPU and it works fine even with
> > CMP configurations with L2 shared and L2 private cache  
> configurations.
> >
> > Also, Is SMT still unsupported on FS? I can't seem to get a clear
> > answer form the m5-user digest.
> >
> > I appreciate the help,
> >
> > Javier
> > Texas A&M University
> > Computer Science and Engineering Department
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
> End of m5-users Digest, Vol 33, Issue 14
> ****************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to