Thanks. It was the bridge connected b/w iobus and membus. For a true system 
evaluation I believe flow-control should be modeled but I guess people just 
publish data with whatever they have got, anyway thats another story.


---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:08:54 -0700
>From: Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>  
>Subject: Re: [m5-users] More than 4 cpus in FS mode  
>To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
>
>   OK... anyway, I'm confident it's a hardware
>   buffering/BW issue somewhere, related to the memory
>   system not scaling and not to Linux specifically. 
>   It would take some more debugging to figure out the
>   details.  If you're really interested in tracking
>   it down, I'd start by backing up a few million
>   cycles from where the assertion failure happens and
>   turning on the Cache and Bus trace flags at that
>   point (if you haven't done that already).  That
>   should help you figure out who is nacking whom.
>
>   Steve
>
>   On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Shoaib Akram
>   <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     that does not help. Private L1/L2 cache hierarchy.
>     32 cpus. L1 mshrs=10, L2 mshrs=30
>     ---- Original message ----
>     >Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:44:35 -0700
>     >From: Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>
>     >Subject: Re: [m5-users] More than 4 cpus in FS
>     mode
>     >To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
>     >
>     >   Actually this is a hardware coherence
>     protocol issue
>     >   and is unrelated to Linux.  You probably
>     need to
>     >   increase the number of MSHRs in one of your
>     >   downstream caches.  In general the number of
>     MSHRs
>     >   in a given cache should be roughly equal to
>     >   (probably slightly greater than) the sum of
>     the
>     >   MSHRs of all the caches above it (i.e.,
>     closer to
>     >   the CPU) so that it can handle all possible
>     >   outstanding accesses.
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     m5-users mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>________________
>_______________________________________________
>m5-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to