On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Gabriel Michael Black wrote: > The "Pagetable Error" issue for 32 bit x86 was fixed, wasn't it?
yes as far as I know. I should clean up that 32-bit page, I've been concentrating on 64-bit sse instructions. I've been meaning to re-run all the 32-bit benchmarks to make sure that all the pagetable errors were in fact mmap related. Vince > > Gabe > > Quoting Vince Weaver <[email protected]>: > > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, CCCP Group wrote: > >> > >> 1- What is the status of x86 support? Is it robust enough to handle > >> spec2006 > >> benchmarks compiled with gcc 4.x? > > > > Not withot a fair number of patches. See > > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~vince/projects/m5 > > to see m5 current x86 status, at least with regard to the spec2k binaries. > > > > With about 15 different patches applied (I'm slowly getting them merged) > > maybe about 1/2 of the spec2k benchmarks will run on the simple atomic > > processor in syscall emulation mode. > > > > Vince > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > -- /* Vince Weaver [email protected] http://csl.cornell.edu/~vince */ main(){char O,o[66]="|\n\\/_ ",*I=o+7,l[]="B!FhhBHCWE9C?cJFKET$+h'Iq*chT" ,i=0,_;while(_=l[i++])for(O=0;O++<_>>5;)*I=*(I++-(_&31));*I=0;puts(o+5);} _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
