There should be another output file somewhere with program (not simulator) output, and there is probably an error message from the program there.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:03 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > this is what i am getting in 5 seconds > : > > command line: build/ALPHA_SE/m5.debug configs/splash2/run.py --rootdir > splash/splash2/codes -t --frequency 1GHz -n 4 --l1size 64kB --l2size 256kB > --l1latency 4ns --l2latency 11ns -b Cholesky > Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #0 on port 7000 > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #1 on port 7001 > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #2 on port 7002 > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #3 on port 7003 > info: Entering event queue @ 0. Starting simulation... > info: Increasing stack size by one page. > warn: ignoring syscall sigprocmask(18446744073709551615, 3, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigprocmask(0, 3, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 8, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 11, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 10, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 4, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 7, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 6, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 12, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 5, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 13, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > Error opening file > warn: ignoring syscall sigprocmask(18446744073709547831, 1, ...) > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f > hack: be nice to actually delete the event here > Exiting @ tick 1147337000 because target called exit() > > and in the stats file stats for one core only. > > thanks biswa > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If it's ending in 4 seconds, it's almost certainly ending with an >> error. I'd think you'd end up with an error message somewhere (maybe >> in one of the output files). >> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:57 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > no its not doing for Cholesky,but its doing FMM and FFT, >> > is it the problem with binaries which prevent it for running for long >> > time,actually it ends in 4 secs,but those FFT and FMM took around 15 to >> > 20 >> > mins. >> > >> > thanks >> > biswa >> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Then my guess is that somehow the arguments that are supposed to tell >> >> the program that it should fork N-1 additional threads aren't getting >> >> passed successfully. Try setting --trace-flag=SyscallVerbose and see >> >> if the program ever calls the thread fork syscall. If it doesn't, >> >> then it's not trying to fork more threads. >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:39 PM, biswabandan panda >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > hi, >> >> > its running for single core. >> >> > >> >> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Is the benchmark running successfully on a single core, or is it not >> >> >> running at all? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:41 PM, biswabandan panda >> >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi all, >> >> >> > i am still getting zeros all the cores except one for >> >> >> > multicore >> >> >> > simulation with splash,some of the m5 users were getting the >> >> >> > result,i >> >> >> > do >> >> >> > not >> >> >> > know whats wrong with my m5,its latest beta 6 version only,splash >> >> >> > i >> >> >> > have >> >> >> > downloaded form m5 splashbenchmarks page.please suggest >> >> >> > something,i >> >> >> > tried >> >> >> > entire night yesterday,but its running for FMM,FFT only with full >> >> >> > stats >> >> >> > for >> >> >> > all cores. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > thanks >> >> >> > biswa >> >> >> > >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > m5-users mailing list >> >> >> > [email protected] >> >> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> m5-users mailing list >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > m5-users mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> m5-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > m5-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
