Hi Ali Saidi, i just modified the original set indexing scheme with my own, in another word, the blk maybe put into set 1 according to original address indexing, now maybe put into set 1025. but i also modified the accessBlk, which will go to set 1025 to check that blk when later referenced, and modified the regenerateAddr() which will return the correct addr when called. Is this a problem?
Thanks, Sheng On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM, sheng qiu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > i modified the lru.cc using some new replacement policy, and incurred this > error. does anyone know what may cause this happen? > > Thanks, > Sheng > > > -- Sheng Qiu Texas A & M University Room 302 Wisenbaker email: [email protected] College Station, TX 77843-3259
_______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
