On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:24 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I've wondered about this too, and assumed it was so you didn't need to > > provide the kernel binary when restarting from a checkpoint. It does > seem > > like a lot of state to save. > Compared to memory? > > > Does this really happen? And if it does, we could just save the > dynamically > > added symbols. > I thought we did for LKMs. Ali? There's also an M5op to add a symbol. > > > Then again, it works as it stands, and even if it's annoying to have the > > whole symbol table in there it's probably not worth the effort to change > > now. > Why is it annoying? The file isn't that big. > It's only annoying when you manually edit checkpoint files... like I said, no real justification to change how it works. I just wanted Nilay to know that he was not alone in wondering about this. Steve
_______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
