We still see cases where authors are puzzled about what to do in response to Gen-ART reviews. Sometimes they rush to produce a new version, which may be the wrong thing to do for several reasons. I'd like to suggest two variants of the boilerplate for the beginning of reviews:
For IETF Last Call reviews: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-FOOBAR.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. ----------------------------------- For IESG Evaluation reviews: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-FOOBAR.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Brian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
