Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Thanks for the review, Francis! > Please resolve these comments along with any other > Last Call comments you may receive. > > Summary: Ready > > Minor points (they should be fixed by the RFC Editor): > - in 1 page 3: a missing closing parenthesis. I suggest to add the > number of the RFCs too. Sounds good. > - is "validatable" (in 4 page 7 and 6 page 9) a correct English word? Er, I guess not :) I suggest rewording (from 4 on page 7): That is, a zone is either in an experiment and only experimentally validatable, or it is not. with That is, a zone is either in an experiment and only possible to validate experimentally, or it is not. And suggest rewording (from 6 on page 9): For instance, the resolver may look at a non-validatable response and conclude that the response is bogus, either due to local policy or implementation details. with For instance, the resolver my look at a response that cannot be validated and still conclude that the response is bogus, either due to local policy or implementation details. > - in 10.2 page 13 reference [6] is obsolete: a new version 03 was > submitted in June. Ah yes. Again, thanks for the review. -- David Blacka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Engineer VeriSign Infrastructure Product Engineering _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
