I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-02 Reviewer: Pasi Eronen Review Date: 2006-12-04 IETF LC End Date: 2006-12-13 IESG Telechat date: (not known yet) Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. Comments: This is a very short document, and in reasonably good shape. Even the security considerations section (which says that there are no additional considerations over RFC2960) is probably sufficient, given that the padding chunks/parameters are not intended to change recipient behavior in any way (modulo concerns about covert channels etc. that IMHO do not have to be described in this document). One editorial suggestion (that could be handled during AUTH48 if the draft is not revised for some other reason): It would be helpful if the abstract mentioned the motivation why someone might want to add padding to SCTP packets (i.e., path MTU discovery). Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
