On 02/21/2007 02:03 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >> It seems to me that an author should be able to expect that a practice >> would be considered OK if it had been allowed in the gen-art review of >> a previous Internet-Draft and had also been allowed by the RFC Editor in >> the corresponding published RFC.
Clearly you want consistency with rfc-editor, and we are all trying to learn how to do reviews from each other. However, I would not require consistency as a strong rule. I think we are still going to be creating the review process for a few more years. The courts, and gen-art, should be allowed to reconsider and even reverse decisions as wisdom is gained and cultures change. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
