Actually I thought there was going to be a meeting at the IETF to clarify the issue that Pasi still has with the current version, but I was not there and it seems nobody followed up on that :-(
I think I am not clear on some of the points still open since on our side we think we addressed them and on his side there are some request pending. Can we make a summary of the open points that need to be addressed for the GEN-Art review to be passed and we can try to find an agreement? Saverio ============================================================ Dr. Saverio Niccolini Senior Researcher NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49 (0)6221 4342-118 Fax: +49 (0)6221 4342-155 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-- !!! NEW ADDRESS !!! ============================================================ NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:43 PM > To: ext Henk Uijterwaal > Cc: Eronen Pasi (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki); Saverio Niccolini; > [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sandra Tartarelli; > Juergen Quittek; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thomas Dietz > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of > draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-07 (-08) > > On 2008-3-5, at 17:21, ext Henk Uijterwaal wrote: > > So do I, but I like to see a document that passes the gen-art first. > > Agreed. Authors, please inform us of your timeline for having > revises this document accordingly? > > Lars > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
