Thank you for your comments.

> Summary: Almost ready for publication as a proposed standard.
>
> Comments:
> Significant:
>       As I read this protocol, if a Home Agent is beign used, then  
> packets arriving at the MAP from the Home Agent will be tunneled,  
> with the original packet inside a header from the HA to the MAP.   
> The MAP will then wrap that up in a tunnel and ship it to the LCoA.   
> This means that HMIP nodes that use Home Agents need to be preapred  
> to receive doubly-encapsulated packets.  But there is no description  
> of this in the Mobile Node Operation section 6.1.
>       This also seems to imply that for communications where a Home Agent  
> is being used, and bidirectional tunneling is being used with the  
> Home Agent, then the Mobile Node needs to generate doubly- 
> encapsulated packets.

=> Ok, I can add text to emphasise this point.

>
>       The section on detecting MAP failures could use improvement.  I  
> realize that this is the same text as was in RFC 4140.  However, it  
> seems to allow fairly common undetected failures.  It seems to me  
> that stronger warning text about the weaknesses of manual intervention

=> Sure.

> , and the possibility of undetected failures even with some keep- 
> alive protocols ought to be mentioned.

=> What type of failures do you have in mind? a reboot that happens  
between keepalives for example?


>
>
> Minor:
>       The changes section indicates that Dynamic MAP discovery was  
> removed. However, section 5 indicates that the distance "SHOULD be  
> set to 1 if Dynamic MAP discovery is used."

=> Ok.

>
>       The fourth paragraph of section 6.1 indicates that a Mobile Node  
> must send a binding update to is Home Agent.  If it is using a Home  
> Agent, this is correct.  However, this spec now indicates that a  
> Home Agent is not mandatory.  So this paragraph should say that the  
> Binding Update must be sent if the Home Agent is being used.

=> ok.

>
>       Given that Home Agents are option, the second paragraph of 6.1.1  
> should be clarified.  Either communicating directly with a CN is  
> only permitted when one has a Home Agent, or the RCoA is permitted  
> in the Home Address option of the Binding Update.

=> ok.

Hesham


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to