Mr.Brim and Mr.Jennings, Thank you for your comments.
> > I still make a friendly suggestion that you document that dependency, > > because if there is an extension to the ATRAC specification in the > > future to support a higher bit rate, this protocol might break. > > > > Scott > > If we assume that the smallest MTU is 576, would anything need to be > > changed? In order to solve the problem, we have two ways that - incorporating rollover mechanism - increasing of bit number for fragment counter(FrgNo) Incorporating rollover is easy to modify the standard. However, the determination of right order of the packets are sometimes impossible if the received packets have the identical FrgNo and severely reversed or inverted arrival of the packets are occured. Regarding on increasing of the bit number, appropriate bit number should be determined considering various MTU size, or assuming some limitation. In addition, the impact of modification of the draft is not small in current (our) system. We are happy if we can have your further comments. Regards, Jun _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
