This addresses all of my comments except for the following two (which are really two instances of the same comment):
On Sep 1, 2008, at 6:01 AM, JP Vasseur wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Section 3.1, definition of "Value" >>> >>> Is the encoding of the numeric value well-known for this context, or >>> should this document specify it? >>> >> >> No change > > It is well-known, simply the number of unconstrained TE LSP. > >> >>> Section 3.2, definition of "Value" >>> >>> Is the encoding of the numeric value well-known for this context, or >>> should this document specify it? >> >> No change > > It is well-known, simply the number of unconstrained TE LSP. > > For each of these, my question was more to the encoding of the value, rather than its meaning. The definition is a 2 octet number. Is that binary? digit characters? Something else? Perhaps the underlying protocol already defines the encoding for "number", in which case it is fine as is. Thanks! Ben. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
