Hi Francis,
Thanks for your review.
--On December 5, 2008 10:50:24 AM +0100 Francis Dupont
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have no reason to change my review (of the -15 version) summary
from Ready to something else. BTW I maintain my *minor* editorial concerns
in 4.1 page 7 (spurious "minimum" words) and 4.2.2 page 10 (e.g. without
the mandatory ',').
Your original comments:
Comments: some editorial details which should be handled by the RFC
Editor: - 3.3 page 6: anotation -> annotation
- 4.1 page &: I have a problem with:
... However, the server MUST accept a minimum
annotation data size of at least 1024 bytes, and a minimum annotation
count per server or mailbox of at least 10.
IMHO the best way to fix this is to remove the words "minimum"
- 4.2.page 10: e.g. -> e.g.,
I am happy to see all these changes included as an RFC editor note to be
corrected prior to publication.
--
Cyrus Daboo
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
