(gen-art list added for proper archiving)
Thanks Dominique. I believe that the -03 version fully
addresses my concerns.
Brian
On 2008-12-20 09:59, dominique.bart...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> On behalf of the authors of draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt, we
> would like to thank you again for your comments.
> Please find attached our response to them, along with the proposed new text
> for the draft and a diff file highlighting the changes.
> Should you consider that the corrections do adequately answer your concerns,
> please let us know and we'll move the new text to become the working group
> next version of the document. We'll also be delighted to see Russ'es
> "Discuss" flag cleared.
> If they don't answer your concerns, can you please let us know of your
> remaining comments, at your earliest convenience?
> With best regards
>
> Dominique
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : dimanche 14 décembre 2008 00:20
> À : Tim Winter
> Cc : Mischa Dohler; General Area Review Team; Dave Ward;
> draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-r...@tools.ietf.org;
> roll-cha...@tools.ietf.org; hous...@vigilsec.com; JACQUENET Christian
> ROSI-ITNPS-NAD-TIP
> Objet : Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt
> (correctedSubject)
>
> Thanks, Tim, I'll look forward to the next version then.
>
> As far as the MUST/SHOULD language is concerned, I'll be interested to see
> the IESG's current view; my personal view is that capitalisation isn't needed
> for design requirements.
>
> Brian
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
