I added an RFC editor's note to cover these editorial points. Thanks, Ross
-----Original Message----- From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spen...@wonderhamster.org] Sent: 25 November 2008 16:34 To: suk...@ece.drexel.edu; j...@ece.drexel.edu; j...@cisco.com Cc: General Area Review Team; Ross Callon; Adrian Farrel; Deborah Brungard Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-dasgupta-ccamp-path-comp-analysis-02 I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-dasgupta-ccamp-path-comp-analysis-02 Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins Review Date: 2008-11-25 IETF LC End Date: 2008-12-14 IESG Telechat date: (not known) Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Comments: You can drop the 2119 boilerplate text (because you don't use it). There are some nits (I noticed s/Virutal/Virtual/ and s/Eventhough/Even though/) for the editor. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
