On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:35:23AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:30:21AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > Summary: Almost ready; needs one clarification. > > > > Comments: > > > > I was expecting the sentence quoted below to be updated > > following Nico's comments on my Last Call comment. I think the new > > text would be > > > > Where the language binding of the GSS-API model's channel bindings is > > as > > single OCTET STRINGs (or the language's equivalent), then the > > implementation > > SHOULD assume that the given bindings correspond only to the > > application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS as shown above. > > Oops, sorry I missed that edit. I'll submit a revised I-D shortly -- > I'll s/is as/is as a/.
Er, no, I did update that. I replaced the above with: Where a language binding of the GSS-API models channel bindings as OCTET STRINGs (or the language's equivalent), then the implementation MUST assume that the given bindings correspond only to the application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS as shown above, rather than some encoding of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS. I think that's clearer. Nico -- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
