I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sip-eku-05.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2009-06-02 IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-05 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: (I apologize to have been late to send this review) - 1.2 page 3: X.680 [5],X.690 [6]. -> X.680 [5], X.690 [6]. - 3 page 4: the application need not recognize -> needs??? (BTW the spelling error, if it is an error, is in RFC 5280) - 9.1 page 7: IMHO (and shown by experience) numbering of references can lead to problems... I suggest to go to named references for next documents, in particular if they are longer. Regards francis.dup...@fdupont.fr PS: I don't comment about the EKU idea, I've seen some PKI experts in Acknowledgments so I expect you do the right thing. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
