Hi Vijay,
Thank you for your review.
--On September 16, 2009 4:52:40 PM -0500 "Vijay K. Gurbani"
<v...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
Nits:
1) Real pedantic nit, sorry.
S6.1.4 is about eavesdropping and not data integrity, right?
But the misuse suffered by a cleartext iCalendar object is
given both treatments: lack of privacy and loss of data
integrity. A simple suggestion would be to remove "and/or
changed" from S6.1.4, and have a new paragraph as follows:
Data Integrity
The iCalendar object is constructed with human-readable
clear text. Any information contained in an iCalendar object
may be changed by unauthorized persons while the object is
in transit.
Would it suffice to keep the text as-is but change the title of that
section to "Eavesdropping and Data Integrity"?
2) Acknowledgments:
s/S.Silverberg/S. Silverberg/
Fixed in my working copy.
And finally, this is more for curiosity than anything else
-- are there any provisions for 3rd party event requests in
iTIP (i.e., an assistant sending out a request on behalf
of someone else.) I could not find any references in
the draft.
I believe this is covered in Section 2.1.3:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis-09#section-2.1.3>.
--
Cyrus Daboo
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
