Version -04 resolves all my previous comments (and adds no new ones ;-)
Thanks,
Spencer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <spen...@wonderhamster.org>
To: <draft-reschke-rfc2731...@tools.ietf.org>
Cc: "General Area Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:43 PM
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-02
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-02
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
Review Date: 2009-10-01
IETF LC End Date: 2009-10-07
IESG Telechat date: (not known)
Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an Informational
RFC.
I have three comments on this short draft...
I wish the IETF community had a clearer understanding of the relationship
between Historic and Obsolete than we have, but that's a comment for IESG
action, not a comment that can be reasonably made in response to Last Call
for this document. Having said that, I THINK this document should be doing
both (setting RFC 2731 to Historic AND Obsolete in the RFC Editor
database). The title says one, and the text says the other - both should
mention both actions, because neither is a superset of the other.
I agree with David Harrington's Last Call comment that including the name
of the RFC being declared Obsolete/Historic in the title of this draft
would be appropriate. I don't expect most members of the IETF community
would remember what RFC 2731 was about (sure, you can actually open the
document, but most of us probably wouldn't need to do that).
Julian pointed out in Last Call discussion that the Dublin Initiative has
been maintaining this specification for nearly 10 years. It would probably
be helpful if the document provided this timestamp - perhaps something
like
[RFC2731] defines "Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML". Newer
specifications published by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative [1]
(DCMI) over the past decade, in particular "Expressing Dublin Core
metadata using HTML/
^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^
XHTML meta and link elements" (DC-HTML,
<http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-html/>), have obsoleted this
work.
Thanks,
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art