Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-eastlake-nlpid-iana-considerations-03.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com> Review Date: 4 December 2009 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Comments: The acronym NLPID should be expanded in the title of the draft. The second paragraph of the Introduction could be more clear. It states that "the term NLPID is used for these values." These values seems to refer to most values that are usable both as IPI and SPI but if the phrase could be rephrased to be more clear, that would be useful. Adding a hyphen so that "one octet" becomes "one-octet" throughout the text would help as well. In Section 3, the draft states: "To simplify this process, it is desirable to maintain an IETF Liaison to ISO/IEC JTC1 SC6." Who is the receiver of this statement. It seems to me that such advice should be sent to the IAB so that they continue this liaison relationship. Clarifying who is the receiver of this statement would be useful. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
