I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: 2010-03-09 LC End Date: 2010-03-11 IESG Telechat date: 2010-03-11 Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: - Page 13, Figure 3: traffic keys derived show two "Send_Other_key" in all 3 boxes. Shouldn't be Rcv_Other_key? - Page 37: sub-section 2: a) Privacy: "TCP exposes "only" the MKT IDs, MAC, and overall option. Question: is "only" really needed? Editorial/nits: - section 2.1: TCP-AO "is" not intended to replace the use of IPsec... - section 2.2: IMHO, the following sentence is not clear: "This document differs from an IPsec/IKE solution in that TCP-AO as follows:" - section 3: In this document, the characters ">>" proceeding... Is it proceeding or preceding? - section 4.2: "The TCP-AO option fields do not indicate the MAC algorithm either implicitly (as with TCP MD5) or explicitly. either/or -> neither/nor - section 5.2: remove "Figure" (repeated twice) Regards, Wassim H.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
