On 6/22/10 12:03 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > Hi Peter: > > There are two aspects of this proposal: > > a) Whether IANA accepts the change in the process to bring the experts > prior to modifications > b) A sentiment that the RFC process, in particular the involvement of > experts in the RFC process, is not enough.
What do you mean by "not enough"? My understanding is that the IANA wants to avoid late surprises that might modify registrations specified in Internet-Drafts, and that they have collaborated with the RFC Editor team to define improved processes for dealing with such problems > While you mention that a) is being addressed, I am worried about b). Do > we agree that the involvement of experts in the RFC process experts is > not enough and needs to be amended by I-D? And if we agree on b), > shouldn't be logical to change the RFC process rather than a workaround? It's not my place to define IANA and RFC Editor processes, so I shall defer to our colleagues on those teams for clarification. Peter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
