I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-10.txt
    Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 19-Sept-2010
IESG Telechat date: 23 Sept 2010

Summary: This document appears to be nearly ready for publications as a Proposed Standard

Major issues: None

Minor issues:
Section 5.6 says "Names must conform to the "name" production and values encodings to the "value" production defined in Section 5.5" However, section 5.5 says that valid element names and value ranges are defined by the FEC scheme. There are no "production for these fields in section 5.5.

The text in section 8 seems to imply that cellular devices experience high loss rates. This is misleading, as radio level protocols generally provide sufficient flow control and retransmission so as to bring the link behavior to levels similar to that of other media. Please either recheck the assumptions being made, or consider removing the reference to cellular links.

Nits/editorial comments:
The definition of Application Data Unit should include an indication that this is referred to as an ADU.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to