I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01 Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad Review Date: 16-March-2011 IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011 IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item - Major issue: none - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in this context. idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA. Regards, Wassim H. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
