Pete: which protocols would you make mandatory? Personally I prefer SCTP and/or application-specific quick reconnect :-) (my point being there's no consensus, alas, but we're letting a hundred flowers bloom)
Scott On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:50, Pete McCann <mc...@petoni.org> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11 > Reviewer: Pete McCann > Review Date: 07-13-2011 > IETF LC End Date: > IESG Telechat date: 07-14-2011 > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > I am disappointed by the section on Mobility which makes no recommendation on > mandatory-to-support mobility protocols. However, given the current > state of things the section as written is reasonable. > > Nits/editorial comments: None > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
