Maybe there's an error with the alias, but that's the one for which I got an undelivered response. Did you not receive one in your response?
Mary. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kompella, Vachaspathi P (Vach) < vach.kompe...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > ** > Joe's email is joe.re...@alcatel-lucent.com. > > -Vach > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Mary Barnes [mailto:mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, August 19, 2011 9:52 AM > > *To:* gen-art@ietf.org > *Cc:* draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw....@tools.ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review: <draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw-07> > > One more nit - the email addresses for Joe Regan and Ulrich Drafz don't > appear to be current. > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mary Barnes > <mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < >> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw-07 >> Reviewer: Mary Barnes >> Review Date: 19 2011 >> IETF LC End Date: 20 May 2011 >> IESG Telechat Date: 25 August 2011 >> >> Summary: Ready with nits >> >> The minor issues and nits in my Last Call review have been addressed. >> There are a couple nits that were introduced with these changes. >> >> Nit: >> ---- >> - Section 1.2: "it will always be will preceded" -> "it will always be >> preceded" >> >> - Section 8.5: There's a stray "In a" at the end of the first/only >> paragraph. >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
