I have mixed emotions on this one. I do a lot of reviews offline, so having to 
enter it into a form could be a pain. As it is, I just "send" the email, and my 
computer takes care of it when get back online. Also, I use my iPad for a lot 
of reviews, and most of the IETF tools that involve uploading content don't 
work from an iPad. I can paste into a text field, but I can't upload a 
file--which is the metaphor most of the other tools use.

OTOH, the "paste a URL" approach is error prone. The pasted URI has nothing to 
tell me I put in the right one. If I make a cut/paste error, I'm not likely to 
notice it. Maybe if the actual content was displayed after saving, I would have 
a chance to notice a problem and fix it.

On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:

> Okay. Personally, I would rather enter the review in a form and have the tool 
> do all the magic of sending it to the mailing list, related authors, etc.  
> I'm not sure if that is more difficult than this approach.  
> 
> Thanks,
> Mary. 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:19 PM, A. Jean Mahoney <maho...@nostrum.com> wrote:
> Hi Mary,
> 
> Yes, reviewers need to enter the URLs manually.
> 
> When you have posted your review to the gen-art mailing list:
> 
>  o  Click the Done button for the document on the review tool.
>  o  Find your review on 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/maillist.html.
>  o  Paste the review's URL in the Review URL field.
>  o  Click the Save button.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jean
> 
> 
> On 11/1/11 4:04 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> Jean,
> 
> Thanks for working with Henrik and Tero to get this done.
> 
> I have a question.  I see one of my assignments, but it is one that I already 
> reviewed.  If I click Done for the review, it seems I need to enter the URL 
> for the review.  Will we have to enter the URLs manually or will those be 
> populated by the tool?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mary.
> 
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, A. Jean Mahoney <maho...@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:maho...@nostrum.com>> wrote:
> 
>    Hi all,
> 
>    The Gen-ART review tool is ready to be tested.
> 
>    Users of the review tool should have received automatically
>    generated emails starting with "[genart review tool]".
> 
>    Steps on accessing and working with the tool can be found here:
>    http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen_art_review_tool_how-to.html
> 
>    Please log in and check the My Info page for your user
>    information, then check the My Queue page. Most reviewers should
>    see one or more recent assignments, which are for documents
>    currently in Last Call and/or on the November 3 Telechat. David,
>    Elwyn, Kathleen, and Richard: your queues are empty for the moment.
> 
>    If the assignment is unfamiliar to you, I've probably fumbled
>    something. Please reject the assignment. Otherwise, accept the
>    assignment.
> 
>    As we're testing the tool, I'll continue to provide last call and
>    telechat assignments in the traditional format. The gen-art.html
>    page and the HTML assignment pages found on
>    http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/ will continue to be the
>    official method of recording and assigning reviews until otherwise
>    noted.
> 
>    Please let me know if you have trouble accessing the tool,
>    questions on how it works, or any feedback. I'm collecting bugs
>    and enhancement requests.
> 
>    Thanks to Tero Kivinen and Henrik Levkowetz for creating and
>    helping set up this tool!
> 
>    Jean
>    _______________________________________________
>    Gen-art mailing list
>    Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to